• español
    • English
    • español
    • English
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    View Item 
    •   TITULA home
    • Universidad Europea de Madrid
    • Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas y de la Salud
    • Grado
    • View Item
    •   TITULA home
    • Universidad Europea de Madrid
    • Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas y de la Salud
    • Grado
    • View Item

    Preparation Types for Ceramic Veneers

    Author/s: Sarda, Océane
    Advisor/s: Fernando Sanclemente Reina
    Keyword/s: Odontología; Materiales dentales
    Degree: Grado en Odontología
    Date of defense: 2021-06
    Type of content: TFG
    URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12880/634
    Abstract:
    This literature review identifies the different types of dental preparation designs for ceramic veneers and compares their corresponding prognosis. Obectives: The purpose of this work is to describe the different types of preparation for ceramic veneers. In parallel, this study will aim to: 1. Compare preparation types at the cervical limit according to their long-term prognosis 2. Compare preparation types at the incisal limit according to their long-term prognosis 3. Compare the advantages and disadvantages or conventional preparations with the “no prep” veneers Methodology: An electronic search strategy was conducted involving MEDLINE, BIBLIOTECA CRAI and GOOGLE SCHOLAR. Keywords used were veneers, preparation types, survival rates, incisal overlap, finish lines. Results: The articles were selected according to multiple inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 76 articles were included in this review. Both in vivo and in vitro studies were included in the review, as well as case reports, bibliographical reviews and extracts from books. Aspects of the preparation designs were quantified and analyzed from a analyze of these articles. Conclusion: We can distinguish three types of dental preparations for anterior veneers: type I, type II and type III. 1) The light chamfer cervical preparation is the most conservative and suitable option and 2) Type I and type II incisal preparations should be favored (Type II presenting the lowest risk of post-operative failure). Type III incisal preparation is Contraindicated.
    Export: Exportar a MendeleyExportar a RefWorksExportar a EndNoteExportar a RISExportar a BibTeX
    Show full item record

    Files in this item

    ADOBE PDF
    Name: 187.pdf
    Size: 20.47Mb
    Format: PDF
    Type of content: TFG

    Collections

    • Grado
    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternacionalExcept where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional

    TITULA. Repositorio de Proyectos Fin de titulación

    © Universidad Europea de Madrid - Universidad privada | email: titula_rep@universidadeuropea.es | All rights reserved

     

     

    Browse

    All of TITULACommunities and collectionsAuthors and advisorsTitlesKeywordsDegreesThis CollectionAuthors and advisorsTitlesKeywordsDegrees

    Information And Help

    Frequently Asked QuestionsSearch projectsContact

    TITULA. Repositorio de Proyectos Fin de titulación

    © Universidad Europea de Madrid - Universidad privada | email: titula_rep@universidadeuropea.es | All rights reserved