• español
    • English
    • español
    • English
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    Ver ítem 
    •   TITULA principal
    • Universidad Europea de Madrid
    • Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas y de la Salud
    • Grado
    • Ver ítem
    •   TITULA principal
    • Universidad Europea de Madrid
    • Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas y de la Salud
    • Grado
    • Ver ítem

    Sinus Lift: Therapeutic Options to Restore the Posterior Maxilla

    Autor/es: Eltawil, Youssef Sherif Bahgat Aly
    Director/es: Villlota de Jorge, Margarita
    Palabra/s clave: Odontología; Maxilares; Cirugía
    Titulación: Grado en Odontología
    Fecha de defensa: 2021-06
    Tipo de contenido: TFG
    URI: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12880/618
    Resumen:
    The posterior maxilla is one of the most challenging areas when considering dental implants as the treatment of choice to restore an edentulous area. Sinus augmentation is a technique which aims to lift the maxillary sinus floor to help achieve ideal and optimal conditions for implant placement. Objective: The aim of this review is to compare the available techniques of sinus augmentation as well as their indications. It will also achieve an analysis of the effects on residual bone height with the use of different types of biomaterials used as well as identify common complications in sinus augmentation. Methodology: 23 articles were selected from PubMed, 1 article published on Madridge Journal of dentistry and dental oral surgery and 1 article published on Medknow. The articles were published from the year 2015 to the year 2020 with a total of 37 trials. Results: 97.3% of the trials were performed on humans while only 2.7% were on animals, with a most common age range between 26-73 years and an average of 27 patients in the trials. The most prevalent technique was the lateral window approach which was done on 618 individuals. 73.7% of the patients presented a residual bone height between 2-7mm and a total of 1187 implants were placed simultaneously, and 667 implants had delayed placement. Most common complication was membrane perforations present in 10 trials. Autogenous bone block showed an average of 12.55mm of residual bone gain and was considered the highest. Conclusion: The lateral window technique was done when the residual bone height is ≤. 4mm and the transcrestal approach when it was >5mm. Autografts showed highest increase in residual bone height but other materials and graftless techniques are comparable. The most prevalent complication was membrane perforations.
    Exportar: Exportar a MendeleyExportar a RefWorksExportar a EndNoteExportar a RISExportar a BibTeX
    Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

    Ficheros en el ítem

    ADOBE PDF
    Nombre: 171.pdf
    Tamaño: 27.42Mb
    Formato: PDF
    Tipo de contenido: TFG

    Colecciones

    • Grado
    Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 InternacionalExcepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional

    TITULA. Repositorio de Proyectos Fin de titulación

    © Universidad Europea de Madrid - Universidad privada | email: titula_rep@universidadeuropea.es | Todos los derechos reservados

     

     

    Listar

    Todo TITULAComunidades y coleccionesAutores y directoresTítulosPalabras claveTitulacionesEsta colecciónAutores y directoresTítulosPalabras claveTitulaciones

    Información y ayuda

    Preguntas frecuentesBuscar proyectosContacto

    TITULA. Repositorio de Proyectos Fin de titulación

    © Universidad Europea de Madrid - Universidad privada | email: titula_rep@universidadeuropea.es | Todos los derechos reservados